why windows desktop search sucks ass

windows desktop search suckageSo I’m using Windows Desktop Search at work for quick retrieval of emails and files since we’ve grown so used to the “search instead of sort” motto Google thought us. It’s WDS not because we want to use it, but because we have to from the IT guys. They got a bit spooked by the fact that Google Desktop Search allows you to search from other computers, which means parts of company files are stored on Google servers on teh interweb. And t3h intahweb is dangerous! I can get that really, even though it’s a feature you have to activate manually for it to work…

Anyway, so the damn Redmond solution to search it is. Most of it works swell though, but there’s this one thing they got it really wrong. That one thing is the integration with the OS. Yep, you read that one right, their own bloody operating system.

You see, when you’re explorer your files and want to search a file by hitting CTRL-F you used to get this simple Windows search box in the left panel. It’s basic, but it works. Now this panel has of course been replaced by the more advanced, and also more complex Windows Desktop Search. Even if you haven’t indexed the current folder in WDS!

Now, the guys at MicroSoft aren’t stupid, so they warn you about the fact that the current folder isn’t indexed. They also advise you to use the so called “Search Companion” instead, which is that old search box. They also put a picture of that stupid yellow canine in there again, probably because they found out that the animated search companion bitch (I bet it’s female) is the first thing you turned off after you installed XP. Is that thing still around in Vista btw? I wonder.

Instead of warning you that the search form they are putting up is completely useless, how about directing you to that bloody search companion right away, and save me the frustration of having to do that myself. In a pop-up window of course, using the same window wouldn’t be confusing enough.

So the only option is to index the whole fucking disk if you want to get rid of this nuisance. Which of course eats at your disk space, slows your searches, and stuffs your search results with results you never wanted.

Excellent suckage if you ask me.

3 Comments

  1. Posted August 28, 2008 at 2:58 | Permalink

    I couldn’t agree more!

    I tried to search for something on a DVD… it immediately complained that it wasn’t indexed. I don’t understand why it doesn’t just search regardless of indexing.

    Don’t tell me what’s wrong, just do what I asked you to do!

    Morons.
    Lew

  2. Posted September 27, 2008 at 23:44 | Permalink

    You know, Redmond people are not bright. They’re pompous little pussy’s from India. World’s brightest people USE LINUX. PHUCK Microsoft. Consisently they put out STUPID code.. and stupid products. And here we go again. An index tool that doesn’t work with their own OS!!!

    How stupid is that???????????

  3. Posted September 28, 2008 at 20:29 | Permalink

    I wouldn’t call them stupid, but it’s just sad they didn’t manage to intergrate their own desktop search with their own OS in a better way.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*